100% pur jus de pomme trouble vs Haferdrink
Overall, Haferdrink has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | 100% pur jus de pomme troubl... | Haferdrink |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 49 kcal | 29 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 10.9 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0.2 g | 1 g |
| Protein | 0.2 g | 0.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten, Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Haferdrink has 41% fewer calories (29 kcal vs 49 kcal).
- 100% pur jus de pomme trouble has 86% less fat (0.1 g vs 1 g).
- Haferdrink has 95% less sugar (0.5 g vs 10.9 g).
- Haferdrink has 77% more fiber (1 g vs 0.2 g).
- Haferdrink has 81% more protein (0.9 g vs 0.2 g).
- Haferdrink has the better Nutri-Score.
- 100% pur jus de pomme trouble is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Haferdrink lists: Gluten, Nuts.
Ingredients
100% pur jus de pomme trouble
Jus de pomme issu de l'agriculture biologique 100%
Haferdrink
Wasser, Hafer (9%), Inulin, Sonnenblumenöl mit hohem Fettsäuregehalt, Calciumcarbonat, Meersalz, Stabilisator (Gellan), Vitamine (Riboflavin, Vitamin B12, Vitamin D). Kann SCHALENFRÜCHTE enthalten.
FAQ
Which is healthier: 100% pur jus de pomme trouble or Haferdrink?
Overall, Haferdrink has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Haferdrink has fewer calories: 29 kcal versus 49 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Haferdrink has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 10.9 g per 100 g.