Fullkorn Makaroni vs Harina de trigo
Overall, Harina de trigo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fullkorn Makaroni | Harina de trigo |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 350 kcal | 346 kcal |
| Fat | 2 g | 1.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 3 g | 0.6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 7 g | 6.8 g |
| Protein | 14 g | 10.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Harina de trigo has 35% less fat (1.3 g vs 2 g).
- Harina de trigo has 70% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
- Harina de trigo has 80% less sugar (0.6 g vs 3 g).
- Fullkorn Makaroni has 26% more protein (14 g vs 10.3 g).
Ingredients
Fullkorn Makaroni
Fullkornsmel av durumhvete (55%), mel av durumhvete
Harina de trigo
Harina de trigo
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fullkorn Makaroni or Harina de trigo?
Overall, Harina de trigo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Harina de trigo has fewer calories: 346 kcal versus 350 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Harina de trigo has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 3 g per 100 g.