Comparison

Francine pain multi céréales vs Farina Tipo "00" di Grano Tenero

Overall, Farina Tipo "00" di Grano Tenero has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFrancine pain multi céréalesFarina Tipo "00" d...
Nutri-Score c a
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 259 kcal 345 kcal
Fat 5.4 g 1.7 g
Saturated fat 0.7 g 0.4 g
Sugars 0.8 g 0.2 g
Salt 1.2 g 0 g
Fiber 4.1 g 2.9 g
Protein 10 g 11 g
Additives10
AllergensGlutenNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Francine pain multi céréales has 25% fewer calories (259 kcal vs 345 kcal).
  • Farina Tipo "00" di Grano Tenero has 69% less fat (1.7 g vs 5.4 g).
  • Farina Tipo "00" di Grano Tenero has 75% less sugar (0.2 g vs 0.8 g).
  • Farina Tipo "00" di Grano Tenero has no salt, while Francine pain multi céréales has 1.2 g.
  • Francine pain multi céréales has 29% more fiber (4.1 g vs 2.9 g).
  • Farina Tipo "00" di Grano Tenero has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Francine pain multi céréales lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Francine pain multi céréales

Farine de blé, graines de tournesol, farine de seigle, graines de lin brun, gluten de blé, levain de blé désactivé et déshydraté, malt d'orge toasté, agent de traitement de la farine : acide ascorbique, enzyme. Céréales : 86%.

Farina Tipo "00" di Grano Tenero

wheat flour type ,quot,00,quot,

FAQ

Which is healthier: Francine pain multi céréales or Farina Tipo "00" di Grano Tenero?

Overall, Farina Tipo "00" di Grano Tenero has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Francine pain multi céréales has fewer calories: 259 kcal versus 345 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Farina Tipo "00" di Grano Tenero has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 0.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons