Comparison
Fleur de Lava vs Corsica
Overall, Corsica has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fleur de Lava | Corsica |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 376 kcal | 332 kcal |
| Fat | 32.3 g | 28 g |
| Saturated fat | 21.9 g | 19.9 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 1.9 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 21.4 g | 20 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Corsica has 12% fewer calories (332 kcal vs 376 kcal).
- Corsica has 13% less fat (28 g vs 32.3 g).
- Corsica has no sugar, while Fleur de Lava has 0.5 g.
- Fleur de Lava has 54% less salt (0.9 g vs 1.9 g).
Ingredients
Fleur de Lava
LAIT de brebis pasteurisé, sel, presure et ferments.
Corsica
Lait pasteurisé origine France
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fleur de Lava or Corsica?
Overall, Corsica has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Corsica has fewer calories: 332 kcal versus 376 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Corsica has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.