Comparison
Fleur de Lava vs U bel Fiuritu
Overall, Fleur de Lava has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fleur de Lava | U bel Fiuritu |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 376 kcal | 313 kcal |
| Fat | 32.3 g | 26 g |
| Saturated fat | 21.9 g | 18 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 2.7 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 21.4 g | 19 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- U bel Fiuritu has 17% fewer calories (313 kcal vs 376 kcal).
- U bel Fiuritu has 20% less fat (26 g vs 32.3 g).
- U bel Fiuritu has 18% less saturated fat (18 g vs 21.9 g).
- Fleur de Lava has 68% less salt (0.9 g vs 2.7 g).
- Fleur de Lava has 11% more protein (21.4 g vs 19 g).
- Fleur de Lava has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Fleur de Lava
LAIT de brebis pasteurisé, sel, presure et ferments.
U bel Fiuritu
Lait de brebis entier pasteurisé origine France, sel, présure, ferments
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fleur de Lava or U bel Fiuritu?
Overall, Fleur de Lava has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
U bel Fiuritu has fewer calories: 313 kcal versus 376 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fleur de Lava has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.