Comparison

Fish Fingers vs Fish finger

Overall, Fish Fingers has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFish FingersFish finger
Nutri-Score b b
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 179 kcal 190 kcal
Fat 7.9 g 8.3 g
Saturated fat 1 g 0.9 g
Sugars 0.5 g 0.8 g
Salt 1 g 1.2 g
Fiber — 0.9 g
Protein 12 g 13.2 g
Additives03
AllergensFish, GlutenFish, Gluten, Mustard

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Fish Fingers has 38% less sugar (0.5 g vs 0.8 g).
  • Fish Fingers is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Fish finger lists: Mustard.

Ingredients

Fish Fingers

Alaska-Seelachs Mus 2) (65 %), Weizenmehl, Sonnenblumenöl, Kartoffelstärke Wasser, Speisesalz, Hefe, Gewürze (Paprika). 2) Alaska-Seelachs(Theragra chalcogramma),gefangen im A) Nordwestpazifk FAO Nr.61 Ochotskisches Meer) oder B) Nordostpazifik FAO Nr.67 (Beringsee/Golfvon Alaska) Schleppretze.

Fish finger

Alaska Pollock Fillet (60%) (Fish), Wheat Flour [Wheat Flour, Calcium Carbonate, Iron, Niacin (B3), Thiamin (B1)], Rapeseed Oil, Water, Gram Flour, Potato Starch, Wheat Starch, Salt, Maltodextrin, Raising Agents: Diphosphates, Sodium Bicarbonate; Wheat Gluten, Cocoa Butter, Onion Powder, Spice (Mustard), Mustard Flour, Garlic Powder, Yeast Extract, Flavour (contains Mustard), Sunflower Oil, Spice Extract

FAQ

Which is healthier: Fish Fingers or Fish finger?

Overall, Fish Fingers has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Fish Fingers has fewer calories: 179 kcal versus 190 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Fish Fingers has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons