Fischstäbchen vs Crustifish
Overall, Crustifish has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fischstäbchen | Crustifish |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 185 kcal | 180 kcal |
| Fat | 7.9 g | 8.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 1 g | 0.9 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 1.9 g |
| Salt | 0.7 g | 0.4 g |
| Fiber | 0.9 g | 1.4 g |
| Protein | 13 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish, Gluten, Alaska SeeIachsfiIet | Fish, Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fischstäbchen has 47% less sugar (1 g vs 1.9 g).
- Crustifish has 43% less salt (0.4 g vs 0.7 g).
- Crustifish has 36% more fiber (1.4 g vs 0.9 g).
- Only Fischstäbchen lists: Alaska SeeIachsfiIet.
Ingredients
Fischstäbchen
65% _Alaska-SeeIachsfiIet_, _Weizenmehl_, Sonnenblumenöl, Kartoffelstärke, Wasser, Speisesalz, Hefe, Gewürze (Weißer Pfeffer, Paprika)
Crustifish
Filets de colin d'Alaska MSC 65% (poisson,Theragra chalcogramma pêché au chalut en Océan Pacifique Nord-Est FAO 67 et Nord-Ouest FAO 61), farine de _blé_, eau, huile de tournesol, sel, épices (paprika, curcuma), levure.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fischstäbchen or Crustifish?
Overall, Crustifish has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Crustifish has fewer calories: 180 kcal versus 185 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fischstäbchen has less sugar: 1 g versus 1.9 g per 100 g.