Crustifish vs Bâtonnets Colin d'Alaska MSC
Overall, Crustifish has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Crustifish | Bâtonnets Colin d'Alaska MSC |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 180 kcal | 222 kcal |
| Fat | 8.5 g | 9.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.9 g | 0.8 g |
| Sugars | 1.9 g | 1.1 g |
| Salt | 0.4 g | 0.7 g |
| Fiber | 1.4 g | 0.9 g |
| Protein | 12 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish, Gluten | Fish, Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Crustifish has 19% fewer calories (180 kcal vs 222 kcal).
- Bâtonnets Colin d'Alaska MSC has 42% less sugar (1.1 g vs 1.9 g).
- Crustifish has 36% more fiber (1.4 g vs 0.9 g).
- Crustifish has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Crustifish
Filets de colin d'Alaska MSC 65% (poisson,Theragra chalcogramma pêché au chalut en Océan Pacifique Nord-Est FAO 67 et Nord-Ouest FAO 61), farine de _blé_, eau, huile de tournesol, sel, épices (paprika, curcuma), levure.
Bâtonnets Colin d'Alaska MSC
Colin d'Alaska 58%, chapelure 20% (farine de blé 17%, eau, épices, sel, levure), huile de colza, eau, farine de blé 4%, amidon, sel, huile de poisson 0,29%,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Crustifish or Bâtonnets Colin d'Alaska MSC?
Overall, Crustifish has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Crustifish has fewer calories: 180 kcal versus 222 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bâtonnets Colin d'Alaska MSC has less sugar: 1.1 g versus 1.9 g per 100 g.