Fischstäbchen vs Bâtonnets Colin d'Alaska MSC
Overall, Fischstäbchen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fischstäbchen | Bâtonnets Colin d'Alaska MSC |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 185 kcal | 222 kcal |
| Fat | 7.9 g | 9.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 1 g | 0.8 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 1.1 g |
| Salt | 0.7 g | 0.7 g |
| Fiber | 0.9 g | 0.9 g |
| Protein | 13 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish, Gluten, Alaska SeeIachsfiIet | Fish, Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fischstäbchen has 17% fewer calories (185 kcal vs 222 kcal).
- Fischstäbchen has 16% less fat (7.9 g vs 9.4 g).
- Fischstäbchen has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Fischstäbchen lists: Alaska SeeIachsfiIet.
Ingredients
Fischstäbchen
65% _Alaska-SeeIachsfiIet_, _Weizenmehl_, Sonnenblumenöl, Kartoffelstärke, Wasser, Speisesalz, Hefe, Gewürze (Weißer Pfeffer, Paprika)
Bâtonnets Colin d'Alaska MSC
Colin d'Alaska 58%, chapelure 20% (farine de blé 17%, eau, épices, sel, levure), huile de colza, eau, farine de blé 4%, amidon, sel, huile de poisson 0,29%,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fischstäbchen or Bâtonnets Colin d'Alaska MSC?
Overall, Fischstäbchen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fischstäbchen has fewer calories: 185 kcal versus 222 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fischstäbchen has less sugar: 1 g versus 1.1 g per 100 g.