Fischstäbchen vs Croustibat Petits Trésors
Overall, Fischstäbchen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fischstäbchen | Croustibat Petits Trésors |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 185 kcal | 230 kcal |
| Fat | 7.9 g | 11 g |
| Saturated fat | 1 g | 0.8 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.7 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 0.9 g | 1.4 g |
| Protein | 13 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | Fish, Gluten, Alaska SeeIachsfiIet | Fish, Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fischstäbchen has 20% fewer calories (185 kcal vs 230 kcal).
- Fischstäbchen has 28% less fat (7.9 g vs 11 g).
- Croustibat Petits Trésors has 50% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1 g).
- Croustibat Petits Trésors has 36% more fiber (1.4 g vs 0.9 g).
- Fischstäbchen has the better Nutri-Score.
- Fischstäbchen is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Fischstäbchen lists: Alaska SeeIachsfiIet.
Ingredients
Fischstäbchen
65% _Alaska-SeeIachsfiIet_, _Weizenmehl_, Sonnenblumenöl, Kartoffelstärke, Wasser, Speisesalz, Hefe, Gewürze (Weißer Pfeffer, Paprika)
Croustibat Petits Trésors
Colin d'Alaska 51%, farine de blé, huile de colza, eau, amidon de blé, sel, stabilisant: méthylcellulose, épices, levure, arôme naturel.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fischstäbchen or Croustibat Petits Trésors?
Overall, Fischstäbchen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fischstäbchen has fewer calories: 185 kcal versus 230 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Croustibat Petits Trésors has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1 g per 100 g.