Comparison

Croustibat Petits Trésors vs Croustibat

Overall, Croustibat has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCroustibat Petits TrésorsCroustibat
Nutri-Score b a
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 230 kcal 194 kcal
Fat 11 g 8.7 g
Saturated fat 0.8 g 1 g
Sugars 0.5 g 0.7 g
Salt 0.8 g 0.7 g
Fiber 1.4 g 0.8 g
Protein 12 g 13 g
Additives10
AllergensFish, GlutenFish, Gluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Croustibat has 16% fewer calories (194 kcal vs 230 kcal).
  • Croustibat has 21% less fat (8.7 g vs 11 g).
  • Croustibat Petits Trésors has 43% more fiber (1.4 g vs 0.8 g).
  • Croustibat has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Croustibat Petits Trésors

Colin d'Alaska 51%, farine de blé, huile de colza, eau, amidon de blé, sel, stabilisant: méthylcellulose, épices, levure, arôme naturel.

Croustibat

Colin d'Alaska 61%, chapelure 15% (farine de blé 14%, huile de colza, sel, épices, levure), eau, huiles végétales (colza, coprah), farine de blé 5,8%, amidon de blé, sel, poivre blanc, arôme naturel

FAQ

Which is healthier: Croustibat Petits Trésors or Croustibat?

Overall, Croustibat has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Croustibat has fewer calories: 194 kcal versus 230 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Croustibat Petits Trésors has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons