Crustifish vs Croustibat Petits Trésors
Overall, Crustifish has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Crustifish | Croustibat Petits Trésors |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 180 kcal | 230 kcal |
| Fat | 8.5 g | 11 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.9 g | 0.8 g |
| Sugars | 1.9 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.4 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 1.4 g | 1.4 g |
| Protein | 12 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | Fish, Gluten | Fish, Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Crustifish has 22% fewer calories (180 kcal vs 230 kcal).
- Crustifish has 23% less fat (8.5 g vs 11 g).
- Croustibat Petits Trésors has 74% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.9 g).
- Crustifish has 45% less salt (0.4 g vs 0.8 g).
- Crustifish has the better Nutri-Score.
- Crustifish is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Crustifish
Filets de colin d'Alaska MSC 65% (poisson,Theragra chalcogramma pêché au chalut en Océan Pacifique Nord-Est FAO 67 et Nord-Ouest FAO 61), farine de _blé_, eau, huile de tournesol, sel, épices (paprika, curcuma), levure.
Croustibat Petits Trésors
Colin d'Alaska 51%, farine de blé, huile de colza, eau, amidon de blé, sel, stabilisant: méthylcellulose, épices, levure, arôme naturel.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Crustifish or Croustibat Petits Trésors?
Overall, Crustifish has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Crustifish has fewer calories: 180 kcal versus 230 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Croustibat Petits Trésors has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.9 g per 100 g.