Crustifish vs Croustibat x16
Overall, Croustibat x16 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Crustifish | Croustibat x16 |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 180 kcal | 188 kcal |
| Fat | 8.5 g | 7.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.9 g | 0.6 g |
| Sugars | 1.9 g | 0.7 g |
| Salt | 0.4 g | 0.7 g |
| Fiber | 1.4 g | 0.9 g |
| Protein | 12 g | 13 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish, Gluten | Fish, Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Croustibat x16 has 13% less fat (7.4 g vs 8.5 g).
- Croustibat x16 has 33% less saturated fat (0.6 g vs 0.9 g).
- Croustibat x16 has 63% less sugar (0.7 g vs 1.9 g).
- Crustifish has 36% more fiber (1.4 g vs 0.9 g).
- Crustifish is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Crustifish
Filets de colin d'Alaska MSC 65% (poisson,Theragra chalcogramma pêché au chalut en Océan Pacifique Nord-Est FAO 67 et Nord-Ouest FAO 61), farine de _blé_, eau, huile de tournesol, sel, épices (paprika, curcuma), levure.
Croustibat x16
colin d'alaska 61%, chapelure 15%, (farine de blé 14%, huile de colza, sel , épices, levures), eau, huiles végétales (colza, coprah), farine de blé 5.8%, amidon de blé, sel, poivre blanc, arôme naturel.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Crustifish or Croustibat x16?
Overall, Croustibat x16 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Crustifish has fewer calories: 180 kcal versus 188 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Croustibat x16 has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 1.9 g per 100 g.