Croustibat x16 vs Croustibat
Overall, Croustibat x16 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Croustibat x16 | Croustibat |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 188 kcal | 194 kcal |
| Fat | 7.4 g | 8.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.6 g | 1 g |
| Sugars | 0.7 g | 0.7 g |
| Salt | 0.7 g | 0.7 g |
| Fiber | 0.9 g | 0.8 g |
| Protein | 13 g | 13 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish, Gluten | Fish, Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Croustibat x16 has 15% less fat (7.4 g vs 8.7 g).
- Croustibat x16 has 40% less saturated fat (0.6 g vs 1 g).
Ingredients
Croustibat x16
colin d'alaska 61%, chapelure 15%, (farine de blé 14%, huile de colza, sel , épices, levures), eau, huiles végétales (colza, coprah), farine de blé 5.8%, amidon de blé, sel, poivre blanc, arôme naturel.
Croustibat
Colin d'Alaska 61%, chapelure 15% (farine de blé 14%, huile de colza, sel, épices, levure), eau, huiles végétales (colza, coprah), farine de blé 5,8%, amidon de blé, sel, poivre blanc, arôme naturel
FAQ
Which is healthier: Croustibat x16 or Croustibat?
Overall, Croustibat x16 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Croustibat x16 has fewer calories: 188 kcal versus 194 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Croustibat x16 has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.