Comparison

Colin d'Alaska façon Fish and Chips vs Croustibat

Overall, Croustibat has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientColin d'Alaska façon Fish an...Croustibat
Nutri-Score b a
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 230 kcal 194 kcal
Fat 12 g 8.7 g
Saturated fat 0.9 g 1 g
Sugars 0.6 g 0.7 g
Salt 1 g 0.7 g
Fiber 0.8 g 0.8 g
Protein 11 g 13 g
Additives40
AllergensFish, Gluten, Milk, MustardFish, Gluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Croustibat has 16% fewer calories (194 kcal vs 230 kcal).
  • Croustibat has 28% less fat (8.7 g vs 12 g).
  • Croustibat has 33% less salt (0.7 g vs 1 g).
  • Croustibat has 15% more protein (13 g vs 11 g).
  • Croustibat has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Colin d'Alaska façon Fish and Chips lists: Milk, Mustard.

Ingredients

Colin d'Alaska façon Fish and Chips

_Colin d'Alaska_ 48%, eau, huile de colza, chapelure (dont _blé_), farine de blé, amidon de pommes de terre, farine de maïs, amidon de maïs, sel, poudres à lever (diphosphates et carbonate de sodium), _lait_ écrémé en poudre, _moutarde_, ail en poudre.

Croustibat

Colin d'Alaska 61%, chapelure 15% (farine de blé 14%, huile de colza, sel, épices, levure), eau, huiles végétales (colza, coprah), farine de blé 5,8%, amidon de blé, sel, poivre blanc, arôme naturel

FAQ

Which is healthier: Colin d'Alaska façon Fish and Chips or Croustibat?

Overall, Croustibat has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Croustibat has fewer calories: 194 kcal versus 230 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Colin d'Alaska façon Fish and Chips has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons