Fischstäbchen vs Omega 3 Breaded Alaska Pollock Fish Fingers
Overall, Fischstäbchen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Fischstäbchen
Omega 3 Breaded Alaska Pollock Fish Fingers
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fischstäbchen | Omega 3 Breaded Alaska Pollo... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 185 kcal | 208 kcal |
| Fat | 7.9 g | 9.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 1 g | 0.7 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 0.9 g |
| Salt | 0.7 g | 0.7 g |
| Fiber | 0.9 g | 0.9 g |
| Protein | 13 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish, Gluten, Alaska SeeIachsfiIet | Fish, Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fischstäbchen has 11% fewer calories (185 kcal vs 208 kcal).
- Fischstäbchen has 13% less fat (7.9 g vs 9.1 g).
- Omega 3 Breaded Alaska Pollock Fish Fingers has 30% less saturated fat (0.7 g vs 1 g).
- Fischstäbchen has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Fischstäbchen lists: Alaska SeeIachsfiIet.
Ingredients
Fischstäbchen
65% _Alaska-SeeIachsfiIet_, _Weizenmehl_, Sonnenblumenöl, Kartoffelstärke, Wasser, Speisesalz, Hefe, Gewürze (Weißer Pfeffer, Paprika)
Omega 3 Breaded Alaska Pollock Fish Fingers
Alaska Pollock (FISH) (58%), Rapeseed Oil. Breadcrumb Coating (WHEAT Flour, Water, Potato Starch, Salt, Paprika, Yeast, Turmeric).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fischstäbchen or Omega 3 Breaded Alaska Pollock Fish Fingers?
Overall, Fischstäbchen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fischstäbchen has fewer calories: 185 kcal versus 208 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Omega 3 Breaded Alaska Pollock Fish Fingers has less sugar: 0.9 g versus 1 g per 100 g.