Comparison

Filets panés de Cabillaud vs Croccole

Overall, Filets panés de Cabillaud has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFilets panés de CabillaudCroccole
Nutri-Score b b
NOVA group — 4
Calories 173 kcal 208 kcal
Fat 6.2 g 7.8 g
Saturated fat 0.7 g 0.7 g
Sugars 1.1 g 0.7 g
Salt 0.6 g 1 g
Fiber 0.5 g 0.1 g
Protein 12 g 11 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedFish, Gluten, Mustard

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Filets panés de Cabillaud has 17% fewer calories (173 kcal vs 208 kcal).
  • Filets panés de Cabillaud has 21% less fat (6.2 g vs 7.8 g).
  • Croccole has 36% less sugar (0.7 g vs 1.1 g).
  • Filets panés de Cabillaud has 38% less salt (0.6 g vs 1 g).
  • Filets panés de Cabillaud has 82% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0.1 g).
  • Only Croccole lists: Fish, Gluten, Mustard.

Ingredients

Filets panés de Cabillaud

Not available.

Croccole

Filetti di MERLUZZO d'Alaska o MERLUZZO del Pacifico 51%*, farina di FRUMENTO, acqua, olio vegetale di colza, sale, amido di FRUMENTO, SENAPE, lievito, destrosio, zucchero, paprica, curcuma. Può contenere tracce di _LATTE_.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Filets panés de Cabillaud or Croccole?

Overall, Filets panés de Cabillaud has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Filets panés de Cabillaud has fewer calories: 173 kcal versus 208 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Croccole has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 1.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons