Filets de rouget vs Filet de rouget/ ricciole ricotta-épinard
Overall, Filets de rouget has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filets de rouget | Filet de rouget/ ricciole ri... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 90 kcal | 125 kcal |
| Fat | 0.9 g | 4.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 2.7 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 1.9 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.7 g |
| Protein | 18 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Eggs, Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filets de rouget has 28% fewer calories (90 kcal vs 125 kcal).
- Filets de rouget has 82% less fat (0.9 g vs 4.9 g).
- Filets de rouget has 89% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 2.7 g).
- Filets de rouget has no sugar, while Filet de rouget/ ricciole ricotta-épinard has 1.9 g.
- Filets de rouget has 73% less salt (0.2 g vs 0.7 g).
- Filets de rouget has 39% more protein (18 g vs 11 g).
- Filets de rouget has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Filet de rouget/ ricciole ricotta-épinard lists: Eggs, Gluten.
Ingredients
Filets de rouget
Not available.
Filet de rouget/ ricciole ricotta-épinard
Malgré tous les soins apportés il peut rester quelques arétes-Retirer les étiquettes avant cuissonsrisque de coloration-Gonnement de la barquette pour une cuisson papillotte METTRE LA BARQUETTE AU MICRO-ONDE SANS PERCER L'EMBALLAGE &Etaboré dans atelier un
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filets de rouget or Filet de rouget/ ricciole ricotta-épinard?
Overall, Filets de rouget has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filets de rouget has fewer calories: 90 kcal versus 125 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filets de rouget has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.9 g per 100 g.