Comparison

Filets de MAQUEREAUX BLANCS GRILLÉS AUX HERBES AROMATIQUES vs Filets de maquereaux grillés au naturel

Overall, Filets de maquereaux grillés au naturel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFilets de MAQUEREAUX BLANCS...Filets de maquereaux grillés...
Nutri-Score b b
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 231 kcal 195 kcal
Fat 14 g 10 g
Saturated fat 3.4 g 3.2 g
Sugars 0 g 0.5 g
Salt 0.8 g 0.9 g
Fiber 0 g 0.5 g
Protein 26 g 25 g
Additives00
AllergensFishFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Filets de maquereaux grillés au naturel has 16% fewer calories (195 kcal vs 231 kcal).
  • Filets de maquereaux grillés au naturel has 29% less fat (10 g vs 14 g).
  • Filets de MAQUEREAUX BLANCS GRILLÉS AUX HERBES AROMATIQUES has no sugar, while Filets de maquereaux grillés au naturel has 0.5 g.
  • Filets de maquereaux grillés au naturel has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).

Ingredients

Filets de MAQUEREAUX BLANCS GRILLÉS AUX HERBES AROMATIQUES

Filets de maquereaux blancs grillés 79% (_Poisson_ - Scomber colias ou Scomber japonicus), huile de colza, sel, plantes aromatiques 0,4% (romarin, thym, sarriette, basilic, marjolaine).

Filets de maquereaux grillés au naturel

Filets de maquereaux grillés 85 %, eau, sel.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Filets de MAQUEREAUX BLANCS GRILLÉS AUX HERBES AROMATIQUES or Filets de maquereaux grillés au naturel?

Overall, Filets de maquereaux grillés au naturel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Filets de maquereaux grillés au naturel has fewer calories: 195 kcal versus 231 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Filets de MAQUEREAUX BLANCS GRILLÉS AUX HERBES AROMATIQUES has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons