Filets de maquereaux vs Sgombro al naturale
Overall, Sgombro al naturale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filets de maquereaux | Sgombro al naturale |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 229 kcal | 174 kcal |
| Fat | 17 g | 9.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.9 g | 3.9 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 19 g | 23 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sgombro al naturale has 24% fewer calories (174 kcal vs 229 kcal).
- Sgombro al naturale has 46% less fat (9.2 g vs 17 g).
- Sgombro al naturale has 17% more protein (23 g vs 19 g).
Ingredients
Filets de maquereaux
Filets de maquereaux (Scomber scombrus), eau, sel.
Sgombro al naturale
Sgombro, acqua, sale.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filets de maquereaux or Sgombro al naturale?
Overall, Sgombro al naturale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sgombro al naturale has fewer calories: 174 kcal versus 229 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filets de maquereaux has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.