Filet de maquereaux au naturel vs Sgombro al naturale
Overall, Filet de maquereaux au naturel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filet de maquereaux au natur... | Sgombro al naturale |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 134 kcal | 174 kcal |
| Fat | 8.3 g | 9.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.5 g | 3.9 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 14.3 g | 23 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filet de maquereaux au naturel has 23% fewer calories (134 kcal vs 174 kcal).
- Filet de maquereaux au naturel has 36% less saturated fat (2.5 g vs 3.9 g).
- Sgombro al naturale has no sugar, while Filet de maquereaux au naturel has 0.5 g.
- Sgombro al naturale has 38% more protein (23 g vs 14.3 g).
- Filet de maquereaux au naturel is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Sgombro al naturale lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Filet de maquereaux au naturel
Filets de maquereaux cuits au court-bouillon 65% (filets de maquereaux-sel - épices - aromates) - eau-sel. Traces éventuelles de lait et de moutarde.
Sgombro al naturale
Sgombro, acqua, sale.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filet de maquereaux au naturel or Sgombro al naturale?
Overall, Filet de maquereaux au naturel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filet de maquereaux au naturel has fewer calories: 134 kcal versus 174 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sgombro al naturale has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.