Filet de maquereaux au naturel vs Filetto Sgombro Natural
Overall, Filetto Sgombro Natural has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filet de maquereaux au natur... | Filetto Sgombro Natural |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 134 kcal | 116 kcal |
| Fat | 8.3 g | 2 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.5 g | 0.6 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 14.3 g | 24 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filetto Sgombro Natural has 13% fewer calories (116 kcal vs 134 kcal).
- Filetto Sgombro Natural has 76% less fat (2 g vs 8.3 g).
- Filetto Sgombro Natural has 76% less saturated fat (0.6 g vs 2.5 g).
- Filetto Sgombro Natural has no sugar, while Filet de maquereaux au naturel has 0.5 g.
- Filetto Sgombro Natural has 40% more protein (24 g vs 14.3 g).
- Filetto Sgombro Natural has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Filet de maquereaux au naturel
Filets de maquereaux cuits au court-bouillon 65% (filets de maquereaux-sel - épices - aromates) - eau-sel. Traces éventuelles de lait et de moutarde.
Filetto Sgombro Natural
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filet de maquereaux au naturel or Filetto Sgombro Natural?
Overall, Filetto Sgombro Natural has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filetto Sgombro Natural has fewer calories: 116 kcal versus 134 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filetto Sgombro Natural has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.