Filets de bar avec peau vs Natural Brown Basmati Rice
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filets de bar avec peau | Natural Brown Basmati Rice |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 151 kcal | 350 kcal |
| Fat | 8.8 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 2 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 1.6 g |
| Protein | 18 g | 8.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filets de bar avec peau has 57% fewer calories (151 kcal vs 350 kcal).
- Natural Brown Basmati Rice has 94% less fat (0.5 g vs 8.8 g).
- Natural Brown Basmati Rice has 95% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 2 g).
- Natural Brown Basmati Rice has no sugar, while Filets de bar avec peau has 0.5 g.
- Natural Brown Basmati Rice has 69% more fiber (1.6 g vs 0.5 g).
- Filets de bar avec peau has 51% more protein (18 g vs 8.8 g).
- Filets de bar avec peau has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Filets de bar avec peau lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Filets de bar avec peau
bar (Dicentrarchus labrax)
Natural Brown Basmati Rice
Brown basmati rice
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filets de bar avec peau or Natural Brown Basmati Rice?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filets de bar avec peau has fewer calories: 151 kcal versus 350 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Natural Brown Basmati Rice has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.