Filet de porc, rôti vs Lonzino – Lombo stagionato
Overall, Filet de porc, rôti has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Filet de porc, rôti
Lonzino – Lombo stagionato
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filet de porc, rôti | Lonzino – Lombo stagionato |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 126 kcal | 222 kcal |
| Fat | 4.6 g | 5.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.8 g | 2.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 1.3 g |
| Salt | 1.4 g | 6.2 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | — |
| Protein | 20 g | 42.5 g |
| Additives | 2 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filet de porc, rôti has 43% fewer calories (126 kcal vs 222 kcal).
- Filet de porc, rôti has 12% less fat (4.6 g vs 5.2 g).
- Filet de porc, rôti has 14% less saturated fat (1.8 g vs 2.1 g).
- Filet de porc, rôti has 62% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.3 g).
- Filet de porc, rôti has 78% less salt (1.4 g vs 6.2 g).
- Lonzino – Lombo stagionato has 53% more protein (42.5 g vs 20 g).
- Filet de porc, rôti has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Filet de porc, rôti
Viande de porc, eau, sel de cuisine lodé et non lodé, fécule de pommes de terre, épices, exhausteur de goût: glutamate monosodique, sucre, stabilisant: E 450, sirop de glucose en poudre.
Lonzino – Lombo stagionato
Schweinfleisch. Speisesalz. Dextrose, Gewürze, natürliche Aromen. Antioxidationsmittel: E301, Konservierungsstoffe: E252, E250.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filet de porc, rôti or Lonzino – Lombo stagionato?
Overall, Filet de porc, rôti has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filet de porc, rôti has fewer calories: 126 kcal versus 222 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filet de porc, rôti has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.3 g per 100 g.