Filet de panga vs Pangasiusfilet
Overall, Filet de panga has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filet de panga | Pangasiusfilet |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 50 kcal | 81 kcal |
| Fat | 0.8 g | 1.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.8 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.4 g | 0.4 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 10 g | 16 g |
| Additives | 5 | 1 |
| Allergens | Fish | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filet de panga has 39% fewer calories (50 kcal vs 81 kcal).
- Filet de panga has 53% less fat (0.8 g vs 1.8 g).
- Filet de panga has 64% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 0.8 g).
- Pangasiusfilet has 38% more protein (16 g vs 10 g).
- Pangasiusfilet is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Filet de panga lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Filet de panga
FILETS DE PANGA avec eau ajoutée CONGELES SANS PEAU SANS ARETES INGREDIENTS PANGA, EAU 10%, SEL , STABILISANT (E451. E452), ANTI-OXYDANT (E330, E331, E332) ALLERGENES: POISSON
Pangasiusfilet
95% pangasius, water, zout, voedingszuur (citroenzuur [E330]). Waarvan toegevoegde suikers 0.00g per 100 gram en waarvan toegevoegd zout 0.35g per 100 gram
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filet de panga or Pangasiusfilet?
Overall, Filet de panga has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filet de panga has fewer calories: 50 kcal versus 81 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filet de panga has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.