Comparison

Filet avec des graines de courge vs Pangasiusfilet

Overall, Pangasiusfilet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFilet avec des graines de co...Pangasiusfilet
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 209 kcal 81 kcal
Fat 9.9 g 1.8 g
Saturated fat 1 g 0.8 g
Sugars 0.3 g 0 g
Salt 0.9 g 0.4 g
Fiber 1.1 g 0 g
Protein 15 g 16 g
Additives01
AllergensGlutenNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pangasiusfilet has 61% fewer calories (81 kcal vs 209 kcal).
  • Pangasiusfilet has 82% less fat (1.8 g vs 9.9 g).
  • Pangasiusfilet has no sugar, while Filet avec des graines de courge has 0.3 g.
  • Pangasiusfilet has 55% less salt (0.4 g vs 0.9 g).
  • Filet avec des graines de courge has 100% more fiber (1.1 g vs 0 g).
  • Only Filet avec des graines de courge lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Filet avec des graines de courge

filets de pandas 71%, panure (Farine de blé, amidon de blé, farine de maïs, graines 2% [graines de courges 1,5%, graines de tournesol 0,4%, graines de lin 0,1%], sel de cuisine, poivre noir,sel de mer, levure), huile de colza

Pangasiusfilet

95% pangasius, water, zout, voedingszuur (citroenzuur [E330]). Waarvan toegevoegde suikers 0.00g per 100 gram en waarvan toegevoegd zout 0.35g per 100 gram

FAQ

Which is healthier: Filet avec des graines de courge or Pangasiusfilet?

Overall, Pangasiusfilet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pangasiusfilet has fewer calories: 81 kcal versus 209 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pangasiusfilet has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons