Pangasius Filet vs Pangasiusfilet
Overall, Pangasius Filet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pangasius Filet | Pangasiusfilet |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | a |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 78 kcal | 81 kcal |
| Fat | 0.9 g | 1.8 g |
| Saturated fat | — | 0.8 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.4 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 17 g | 16 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pangasius Filet has 50% less fat (0.9 g vs 1.8 g).
- Pangasius Filet has 88% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.4 g).
Ingredients
Pangasius Filet
Not available.
Pangasiusfilet
95% pangasius, water, zout, voedingszuur (citroenzuur [E330]). Waarvan toegevoegde suikers 0.00g per 100 gram en waarvan toegevoegd zout 0.35g per 100 gram
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pangasius Filet or Pangasiusfilet?
Overall, Pangasius Filet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pangasius Filet has fewer calories: 78 kcal versus 81 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pangasius Filet has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.