Comparison

Pangasius Filet vs Filet avec des graines de courge

Overall, Pangasius Filet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPangasius FiletFilet avec des graines de co...
Nutri-Score — a
NOVA group — 3
Calories 78 kcal 209 kcal
Fat 0.9 g 9.9 g
Saturated fat — 1 g
Sugars 0 g 0.3 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.9 g
Fiber 0 g 1.1 g
Protein 17 g 15 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pangasius Filet has 63% fewer calories (78 kcal vs 209 kcal).
  • Pangasius Filet has 91% less fat (0.9 g vs 9.9 g).
  • Pangasius Filet has no sugar, while Filet avec des graines de courge has 0.3 g.
  • Pangasius Filet has 94% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.9 g).
  • Filet avec des graines de courge has 100% more fiber (1.1 g vs 0 g).
  • Pangasius Filet has 12% more protein (17 g vs 15 g).
  • Only Filet avec des graines de courge lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Pangasius Filet

Not available.

Filet avec des graines de courge

filets de pandas 71%, panure (Farine de blé, amidon de blé, farine de maïs, graines 2% [graines de courges 1,5%, graines de tournesol 0,4%, graines de lin 0,1%], sel de cuisine, poivre noir,sel de mer, levure), huile de colza

FAQ

Which is healthier: Pangasius Filet or Filet avec des graines de courge?

Overall, Pangasius Filet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pangasius Filet has fewer calories: 78 kcal versus 209 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pangasius Filet has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons