Filet de panga vs Pangafilets
Overall, Filet de panga has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filet de panga | Pangafilets |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 50 kcal | 85 kcal |
| Fat | 0.8 g | 1.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.7 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.4 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 10 g | 17.3 g |
| Additives | 5 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filet de panga has 41% fewer calories (50 kcal vs 85 kcal).
- Filet de panga has 51% less fat (0.8 g vs 1.7 g).
- Filet de panga has 59% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 0.7 g).
- Pangafilets has 79% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.4 g).
- Pangafilets has 42% more protein (17.3 g vs 10 g).
Ingredients
Filet de panga
FILETS DE PANGA avec eau ajoutée CONGELES SANS PEAU SANS ARETES INGREDIENTS PANGA, EAU 10%, SEL , STABILISANT (E451. E452), ANTI-OXYDANT (E330, E331, E332) ALLERGENES: POISSON
Pangafilets
Pangasiusfilet (vis).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filet de panga or Pangafilets?
Overall, Filet de panga has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filet de panga has fewer calories: 50 kcal versus 85 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filet de panga has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.