Comparison
Pangasius Filet vs Pangafilets
Overall, Pangasius Filet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pangasius Filet | Pangafilets |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 77 kcal | 85 kcal |
| Fat | 1 g | 1.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.7 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 17 g | 17.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pangasius Filet has 41% less fat (1 g vs 1.7 g).
- Pangasius Filet has no saturated fat, while Pangafilets has 0.7 g.
- Only Pangafilets lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Pangasius Filet
Not available.
Pangafilets
Pangasiusfilet (vis).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pangasius Filet or Pangafilets?
Overall, Pangasius Filet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pangasius Filet has fewer calories: 77 kcal versus 85 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pangasius Filet has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.