Filet de maquereaux grillés nature vs Filets de maquereaux grillés natures
Overall, Filets de maquereaux grillés natures has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Filet de maquereaux grillés nature
Filets de maquereaux grillés natures
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filet de maquereaux grillés... | Filets de maquereaux grillés... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 233 kcal | 206 kcal |
| Fat | 17 g | 15 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.5 g | 3.9 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.1 g | 1.2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 20 g | 18 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filets de maquereaux grillés natures has 12% fewer calories (206 kcal vs 233 kcal).
- Filets de maquereaux grillés natures has 12% less fat (15 g vs 17 g).
- Filets de maquereaux grillés natures has 13% less saturated fat (3.9 g vs 4.5 g).
- Filet de maquereaux grillés nature has no sugar, while Filets de maquereaux grillés natures has 0.5 g.
- Filet de maquereaux grillés nature has 10% more protein (20 g vs 18 g).
- Filets de maquereaux grillés natures has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Filet de maquereaux grillés nature
Filets de maquereaux grillés (90%), eau, sel
Filets de maquereaux grillés natures
Filets de maquereaux (85 %), eau, sel.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filet de maquereaux grillés nature or Filets de maquereaux grillés natures?
Overall, Filets de maquereaux grillés natures has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filets de maquereaux grillés natures has fewer calories: 206 kcal versus 233 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filet de maquereaux grillés nature has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.