Comparison

Fideos Orientales con Pollo y Shiitake vs Quinoa con kale y espinacas

Overall, Quinoa con kale y espinacas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFideos Orientales con Pollo...Quinoa con kale y espinacas
Nutri-Score d b
NOVA group — 3
Calories 115 kcal 145 kcal
Fat 3.9 g 4.3 g
Saturated fat 0.5 g 0.4 g
Sugars 7.4 g 1.7 g
Salt 1.9 g 0.9 g
Protein 7.4 g 4.9 g
Additives01
AllergensNone listedSulphur dioxide and sulphites

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Fideos Orientales con Pollo y Shiitake has 21% fewer calories (115 kcal vs 145 kcal).
  • Quinoa con kale y espinacas has 77% less sugar (1.7 g vs 7.4 g).
  • Quinoa con kale y espinacas has 53% less salt (0.9 g vs 1.9 g).
  • Fideos Orientales con Pollo y Shiitake has 34% more protein (7.4 g vs 4.9 g).
  • Quinoa con kale y espinacas has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Quinoa con kale y espinacas lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.

Ingredients

Fideos Orientales con Pollo y Shiitake

Not available.

Quinoa con kale y espinacas

Quinoa 29,3%, agua, cebolla, pimiento verde, espinacas 7%*, kale 5%*, zanahoria, aceite de oliva virgen extra 2,4%, vino blanco (contiene sulfitos) 1.6%, almidón de maiz, ajo, corrector de la acidez: ácido cítrico, pimienta, jengibre, azúcar de caña procedente de agricultura ecotcorcal

FAQ

Which is healthier: Fideos Orientales con Pollo y Shiitake or Quinoa con kale y espinacas?

Overall, Quinoa con kale y espinacas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Fideos Orientales con Pollo y Shiitake has fewer calories: 115 kcal versus 145 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Quinoa con kale y espinacas has less sugar: 1.7 g versus 7.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons