Farine d'Epeautre type 65 vs Mehl Bio Spelt flour
Overall, Mehl Bio Spelt flour has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Farine d'Epeautre type 65 | Mehl Bio Spelt flour |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 352 kcal | 334 kcal |
| Fat | 1.3 g | 2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 2.2 g | 12 g |
| Protein | 12 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Farine d'Epeautre type 65 has 35% less fat (1.3 g vs 2 g).
- Farine d'Epeautre type 65 has 75% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.4 g).
- Mehl Bio Spelt flour has 82% more fiber (12 g vs 2.2 g).
- Mehl Bio Spelt flour has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Farine d'Epeautre type 65
Farine d'épeautre
Mehl Bio Spelt flour
Epeautre
FAQ
Which is healthier: Farine d'Epeautre type 65 or Mehl Bio Spelt flour?
Overall, Mehl Bio Spelt flour has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Mehl Bio Spelt flour has fewer calories: 334 kcal versus 352 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Farine d'Epeautre type 65 has less sugar: 1 g versus 1 g per 100 g.