Comparison

Farine d'Epeautre type 65 vs Mehl Bio Spelt flour

Overall, Mehl Bio Spelt flour has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFarine d'Epeautre type 65Mehl Bio Spelt flour
Nutri-Score b a
NOVA group 1 1
Calories 352 kcal 334 kcal
Fat 1.3 g 2 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0.4 g
Sugars 1 g 1 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 2.2 g 12 g
Protein 12 g 12 g
Additives00
AllergensGlutenGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Farine d'Epeautre type 65 has 35% less fat (1.3 g vs 2 g).
  • Farine d'Epeautre type 65 has 75% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.4 g).
  • Mehl Bio Spelt flour has 82% more fiber (12 g vs 2.2 g).
  • Mehl Bio Spelt flour has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Farine d'Epeautre type 65

Farine d'épeautre

Mehl Bio Spelt flour

Epeautre

FAQ

Which is healthier: Farine d'Epeautre type 65 or Mehl Bio Spelt flour?

Overall, Mehl Bio Spelt flour has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Mehl Bio Spelt flour has fewer calories: 334 kcal versus 352 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Farine d'Epeautre type 65 has less sugar: 1 g versus 1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons