Comparison

EXTRA LARGE Pitted Ripe Olives vs Bruschettini Snack Size Italian Bruschetta Toasts

Overall, EXTRA LARGE Pitted Ripe Olives has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientEXTRA LARGE Pitted Ripe Oliv...Bruschettini Snack Size Ital...
Nutri-Score c d
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 107 kcal 500 kcal
Fat 10.7 g 12.5 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 0 g 6.3 g
Salt 2.1 g 2.1 g
Fiber — 6.3 g
Protein 0 g 12.5 g
Additives10
AllergensNone listedGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • EXTRA LARGE Pitted Ripe Olives has 79% fewer calories (107 kcal vs 500 kcal).
  • EXTRA LARGE Pitted Ripe Olives has 14% less fat (10.7 g vs 12.5 g).
  • EXTRA LARGE Pitted Ripe Olives has no sugar, while Bruschettini Snack Size Italian Bruschetta Toasts has 6.3 g.
  • Bruschettini Snack Size Italian Bruschetta Toasts has 100% more protein (12.5 g vs 0 g).
  • EXTRA LARGE Pitted Ripe Olives has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Bruschettini Snack Size Italian Bruschetta Toasts lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

EXTRA LARGE Pitted Ripe Olives

Olives, water, sea salt, and ferrous gluconate (an iron derivative).

Bruschettini Snack Size Italian Bruschetta Toasts

Unbleached wheat flour, durum wheat semolina, olive oil, extra virgin olive oil, sea salt, yeast, barley and corn malt extract, sugar.

FAQ

Which is healthier: EXTRA LARGE Pitted Ripe Olives or Bruschettini Snack Size Italian Bruschetta Toasts?

Overall, EXTRA LARGE Pitted Ripe Olives has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

EXTRA LARGE Pitted Ripe Olives has fewer calories: 107 kcal versus 500 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

EXTRA LARGE Pitted Ripe Olives has less sugar: 0 g versus 6.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons