Evaporated Milk vs Kondensmilch 10% Fett
Overall, Evaporated Milk has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Evaporated Milk | Kondensmilch 10% Fett |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 163 kcal | 174 kcal |
| Fat | 9 g | 10 g |
| Saturated fat | 6 g | 6.7 g |
| Sugars | 12.7 g | 13 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0.4 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | — |
| Protein | 7.6 g | 7.9 g |
| Additives | 2 | 2 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Evaporated Milk has 10% less fat (9 g vs 10 g).
- Evaporated Milk has 10% less saturated fat (6 g vs 6.7 g).
Ingredients
Evaporated Milk
Whole _Milk_, Stabilisers: Carrageenan, Sodium Phosphates, Vitamin D.
Kondensmilch 10% Fett
Milch, Stabilisatoren (Carrageen, Natriumphosphate).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Evaporated Milk or Kondensmilch 10% Fett?
Overall, Evaporated Milk has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Evaporated Milk has fewer calories: 163 kcal versus 174 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Evaporated Milk has less sugar: 12.7 g versus 13 g per 100 g.