Kondensmilch 10% Fett vs Evaporated milk
Overall, Evaporated milk has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kondensmilch 10% Fett | Evaporated milk |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 174 kcal | 160 kcal |
| Fat | 10 g | 9 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.7 g | 6.1 g |
| Sugars | 13 g | 12.1 g |
| Salt | 0.4 g | 0.3 g |
| Protein | 7.9 g | 7.6 g |
| Additives | 2 | 2 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Evaporated milk has 10% less fat (9 g vs 10 g).
- Only Kondensmilch 10% Fett lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Kondensmilch 10% Fett
Milch, Stabilisatoren (Carrageen, Natriumphosphate).
Evaporated milk
whole milk stabiliser (sodium phosphates, carrageenan), Vitamin D
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kondensmilch 10% Fett or Evaporated milk?
Overall, Evaporated milk has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Evaporated milk has fewer calories: 160 kcal versus 174 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Evaporated milk has less sugar: 12.1 g versus 13 g per 100 g.