Ensaladas integral vs Pasta alimentaria integral
Overall, Pasta alimentaria integral has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Ensaladas integral | Pasta alimentaria integral |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 370 kcal | 350 kcal |
| Fat | 2.6 g | 2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 3.5 g | 3 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 10 g | — |
| Protein | 13 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pasta alimentaria integral has 23% less fat (2 g vs 2.6 g).
- Pasta alimentaria integral has 14% less sugar (3 g vs 3.5 g).
Ingredients
Ensaladas integral
Sémola integral de trigo duro, espinacas deshidratadas (2,5%) y concentrado de tomate (5%)
Pasta alimentaria integral
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Ensaladas integral or Pasta alimentaria integral?
Overall, Pasta alimentaria integral has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pasta alimentaria integral has fewer calories: 350 kcal versus 370 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pasta alimentaria integral has less sugar: 3 g versus 3.5 g per 100 g.