Pasta alimentaria integral vs Eroski Spaguetti integrales
Overall, Pasta alimentaria integral has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pasta alimentaria integral | Eroski Spaguetti integrales |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 350 kcal | 342 kcal |
| Fat | 2 g | 2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 3 g | 2.8 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 12 g | 9.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pasta alimentaria integral has 20% more protein (12 g vs 9.6 g).
- Pasta alimentaria integral has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Pasta alimentaria integral
Not available.
Eroski Spaguetti integrales
Pasta alimenticia integral de calidad Ingredientes: Semola integral de trigo dur superior, Goi-mailako kalitateko osoko janart pasta. Osaga ak: Gari gogorraren osoko semola. Pasta alimentaria integral de qualitat superior. Ingredients: Semola integral de blat dur. Pasta alimenticia integrat de calidade superior, Ingredientes: Sempla integral de trigo d�a Conservacion: Conservar en lugar frescoy seco. Moda de empleg: Hervir la pasta
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pasta alimentaria integral or Eroski Spaguetti integrales?
Overall, Pasta alimentaria integral has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Eroski Spaguetti integrales has fewer calories: 342 kcal versus 350 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Eroski Spaguetti integrales has less sugar: 2.8 g versus 3 g per 100 g.