Comparison

Encornets farcis vs Calamares en salsa americana

Overall, Encornets farcis has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientEncornets farcisCalamares en salsa americana
Nutri-Score b d
NOVA group — 4
Calories 114 kcal 243 kcal
Fat 5.9 g 17 g
Saturated fat 1.9 g 2.2 g
Sugars 0.3 g 1.9 g
Salt 0.9 g 1.8 g
Protein 10.6 g 15 g
Additives02
AllergensNone listedMolluscs

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Encornets farcis has 53% fewer calories (114 kcal vs 243 kcal).
  • Encornets farcis has 65% less fat (5.9 g vs 17 g).
  • Encornets farcis has 14% less saturated fat (1.9 g vs 2.2 g).
  • Encornets farcis has 84% less sugar (0.3 g vs 1.9 g).
  • Encornets farcis has 48% less salt (0.9 g vs 1.8 g).
  • Calamares en salsa americana has 29% more protein (15 g vs 10.6 g).
  • Encornets farcis has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Calamares en salsa americana lists: Molluscs.

Ingredients

Encornets farcis

་་་་ ་ POLITO des Mets VERSAR ANS 60 US 1963 APPUIS AZAI Lo Belle ARTISAN COM FRANÇAIS INGRED ENCORNETS FARCIS À LA SÉTOISE Farcis et éparés à Main RECETTE TRATIONNE SETOISE Tradition Culinaire de Citerranée 2 À 3 PARTS SAVO INCORNE Po Se Apri Cons

Calamares en salsa americana

Calamares (_moluscos_), salsa americana (aceite de girasol, tomate, cebolla, sal, almidón modificado, azúcar, especias, aroma natural, colorante (extracto de pimentón)).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Encornets farcis or Calamares en salsa americana?

Overall, Encornets farcis has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Encornets farcis has fewer calories: 114 kcal versus 243 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Encornets farcis has less sugar: 0.3 g versus 1.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons