Comparison

Anneaux d'encornet 500g vs Encornets farcis

Overall, Anneaux d'encornet 500g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientAnneaux d'encornet 500gEncornets farcis
Nutri-Score a b
NOVA group 3 —
Calories 46 kcal 114 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 5.9 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 1.9 g
Sugars 0.5 g 0.3 g
Salt 0.6 g 0.9 g
Fiber 0.5 g —
Protein 11 g 10.6 g
Additives20
AllergensMolluscsNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Anneaux d'encornet 500g has 60% fewer calories (46 kcal vs 114 kcal).
  • Anneaux d'encornet 500g has 92% less fat (0.5 g vs 5.9 g).
  • Anneaux d'encornet 500g has 95% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 1.9 g).
  • Anneaux d'encornet 500g has 35% less salt (0.6 g vs 0.9 g).
  • Anneaux d'encornet 500g has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Anneaux d'encornet 500g lists: Molluscs.

Ingredients

Anneaux d'encornet 500g

Encornet (Illex argentinus) pêché à la ligne et hameçons en océan Atlantique Sud-Ouest (FAO 41), eau, sel, correcteurs d'acidité : acide citrique et citrates de sodium. Traces éventuelles de poisson et crustacés. Ce produit doit être consommé après cuisson.

Encornets farcis

་་་་ ་ POLITO des Mets VERSAR ANS 60 US 1963 APPUIS AZAI Lo Belle ARTISAN COM FRANÇAIS INGRED ENCORNETS FARCIS À LA SÉTOISE Farcis et éparés à Main RECETTE TRATIONNE SETOISE Tradition Culinaire de Citerranée 2 À 3 PARTS SAVO INCORNE Po Se Apri Cons

FAQ

Which is healthier: Anneaux d'encornet 500g or Encornets farcis?

Overall, Anneaux d'encornet 500g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Anneaux d'encornet 500g has fewer calories: 46 kcal versus 114 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Encornets farcis has less sugar: 0.3 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons