El piponazo formato ahorro vs Pipas Gigantes con Sal
Overall, El piponazo formato ahorro has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 4.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | El piponazo formato ahorro | Pipas Gigantes con Sal |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 258 kcal | 612 kcal |
| Fat | 21 g | 50.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.8 g | 5.2 g |
| Sugars | 1.1 g | 3.5 g |
| Salt | 10 g | 11 g |
| Fiber | 3.8 g | 11.9 g |
| Protein | 14 g | 30.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- El piponazo formato ahorro has 58% fewer calories (258 kcal vs 612 kcal).
- El piponazo formato ahorro has 58% less fat (21 g vs 50.1 g).
- El piponazo formato ahorro has 46% less saturated fat (2.8 g vs 5.2 g).
- El piponazo formato ahorro has 69% less sugar (1.1 g vs 3.5 g).
- Pipas Gigantes con Sal has 68% more fiber (11.9 g vs 3.8 g).
- Pipas Gigantes con Sal has 55% more protein (30.9 g vs 14 g).
- Pipas Gigantes con Sal has the better Nutri-Score.
- El piponazo formato ahorro is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
El piponazo formato ahorro
Semillas de girasol, sal, harina de arroz, fécula de patata.
Pipas Gigantes con Sal
Pipas de girasol, sal, harina de arroz, espesante (goma guar).
FAQ
Which is healthier: El piponazo formato ahorro or Pipas Gigantes con Sal?
Overall, El piponazo formato ahorro has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
El piponazo formato ahorro has fewer calories: 258 kcal versus 612 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
El piponazo formato ahorro has less sugar: 1.1 g versus 3.5 g per 100 g.