Edamame vs Stoneground Wheat Crackers
Overall, Edamame has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Edamame | Stoneground Wheat Crackers |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 433 kcal | 500 kcal |
| Fat | 16.7 g | 18.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.7 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 6.7 g | 6.3 g |
| Salt | 2.2 g | 1.7 g |
| Fiber | 16.7 g | 6.3 g |
| Protein | 43.3 g | 6.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | Soybeans | Gluten, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Edamame has 13% fewer calories (433 kcal vs 500 kcal).
- Edamame has 11% less fat (16.7 g vs 18.8 g).
- Stoneground Wheat Crackers has no saturated fat, while Edamame has 1.7 g.
- Stoneground Wheat Crackers has 21% less salt (1.7 g vs 2.2 g).
- Edamame has 63% more fiber (16.7 g vs 6.3 g).
- Edamame has 86% more protein (43.3 g vs 6.3 g).
- Edamame has the better Nutri-Score.
- Edamame is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Stoneground Wheat Crackers lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Edamame
Edamame (Soybeans), Avocado Oil, Himalayan Pink Salt Seasoning (Himalayan Pink Salt, Black Pepper, Onion Powder, Garlic Powder, Yeast Extract)
Stoneground Wheat Crackers
ENRICHED WHEAT FLOUR, SAFFLOWER OIL, WHOLE WHEAT FLOUR, WHOLE WHEAT FLAKES, WHOLE BROWN FLAX SEED, CANE SUGAR, BROWN RICE SYRUP, SEA SALT, LEAVENING, BARLEY MALT EXTRACT, SOY LECITHIN, ENZYMES.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Edamame or Stoneground Wheat Crackers?
Overall, Edamame has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Edamame has fewer calories: 433 kcal versus 500 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Stoneground Wheat Crackers has less sugar: 6.3 g versus 6.7 g per 100 g.