Comparison

Duo de choux assaisonnés vs Garrofón

Overall, Garrofón has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientDuo de choux assaisonnésGarrofón
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 3 1
Calories 41 kcal 142 kcal
Fat 2.5 g 0.7 g
Saturated fat 1.4 g 0 g
Sugars 1.2 g 1.8 g
Salt 0.7 g 0 g
Fiber 2.9 g 9.5 g
Protein 1.9 g 9.1 g
Additives00
AllergensCelery, Milk, MustardNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Duo de choux assaisonnés has 71% fewer calories (41 kcal vs 142 kcal).
  • Garrofón has 72% less fat (0.7 g vs 2.5 g).
  • Garrofón has no saturated fat, while Duo de choux assaisonnés has 1.4 g.
  • Duo de choux assaisonnés has 33% less sugar (1.2 g vs 1.8 g).
  • Garrofón has no salt, while Duo de choux assaisonnés has 0.7 g.
  • Garrofón has 69% more fiber (9.5 g vs 2.9 g).
  • Garrofón has 79% more protein (9.1 g vs 1.9 g).
  • Garrofón is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Duo de choux assaisonnés lists: Celery, Milk, Mustard.

Ingredients

Duo de choux assaisonnés

Choux-fleurs 48% - brocolis 48% - beurre 2,3% - huile d'olive vierge extra 0,6% - basilic 0,5% - sel - ail - épice. Traces de céréales, de céleri, de moutarde, de soja et leurs dérivés.

Garrofón

Garrofón

FAQ

Which is healthier: Duo de choux assaisonnés or Garrofón?

Overall, Garrofón has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Duo de choux assaisonnés has fewer calories: 41 kcal versus 142 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Duo de choux assaisonnés has less sugar: 1.2 g versus 1.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons