Comparison

Pisellini Primavera vs Garrofón

Overall, Garrofón has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPisellini PrimaveraGarrofón
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 1 1
Calories 68 kcal 142 kcal
Fat 0.7 g 0.7 g
Saturated fat 0.3 g 0 g
Sugars 4.9 g 1.8 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 6 g 9.5 g
Protein 4.9 g 9.1 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pisellini Primavera has 52% fewer calories (68 kcal vs 142 kcal).
  • Garrofón has no saturated fat, while Pisellini Primavera has 0.3 g.
  • Garrofón has 63% less sugar (1.8 g vs 4.9 g).
  • Garrofón has 37% more fiber (9.5 g vs 6 g).
  • Garrofón has 46% more protein (9.1 g vs 4.9 g).

Ingredients

Pisellini Primavera

Piselli

Garrofón

Garrofón

FAQ

Which is healthier: Pisellini Primavera or Garrofón?

Overall, Garrofón has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pisellini Primavera has fewer calories: 68 kcal versus 142 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Garrofón has less sugar: 1.8 g versus 4.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons