Pisellini Primavera vs Garrofón
Overall, Garrofón has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pisellini Primavera | Garrofón |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 68 kcal | 142 kcal |
| Fat | 0.7 g | 0.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 4.9 g | 1.8 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 6 g | 9.5 g |
| Protein | 4.9 g | 9.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pisellini Primavera has 52% fewer calories (68 kcal vs 142 kcal).
- Garrofón has no saturated fat, while Pisellini Primavera has 0.3 g.
- Garrofón has 63% less sugar (1.8 g vs 4.9 g).
- Garrofón has 37% more fiber (9.5 g vs 6 g).
- Garrofón has 46% more protein (9.1 g vs 4.9 g).
Ingredients
Pisellini Primavera
Piselli
Garrofón
Garrofón
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pisellini Primavera or Garrofón?
Overall, Garrofón has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pisellini Primavera has fewer calories: 68 kcal versus 142 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Garrofón has less sugar: 1.8 g versus 4.9 g per 100 g.