Duo de choux assaisonnés vs Duo haricots extra-fins
Overall, Duo haricots extra-fins has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Duo de choux assaisonnés
Duo haricots extra-fins
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Duo de choux assaisonnés | Duo haricots extra-fins |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 1 |
| Calories | 41 kcal | 32 kcal |
| Fat | 2.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.4 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 1.2 g | 2.5 g |
| Salt | 0.7 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 2.9 g | 3.1 g |
| Protein | 1.9 g | 2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Celery, Milk, Mustard | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Duo haricots extra-fins has 22% fewer calories (32 kcal vs 41 kcal).
- Duo haricots extra-fins has 80% less fat (0.5 g vs 2.5 g).
- Duo haricots extra-fins has 93% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 1.4 g).
- Duo de choux assaisonnés has 52% less sugar (1.2 g vs 2.5 g).
- Duo haricots extra-fins has 97% less salt (0 g vs 0.7 g).
- Duo haricots extra-fins is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Duo de choux assaisonnés lists: Celery, Milk, Mustard.
Ingredients
Duo de choux assaisonnés
Choux-fleurs 48% - brocolis 48% - beurre 2,3% - huile d'olive vierge extra 0,6% - basilic 0,5% - sel - ail - épice. Traces de céréales, de céleri, de moutarde, de soja et leurs dérivés.
Duo haricots extra-fins
Haricots verts extra-fins 50%, haricots beurre extra-fins 50%.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Duo de choux assaisonnés or Duo haricots extra-fins?
Overall, Duo haricots extra-fins has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Duo haricots extra-fins has fewer calories: 32 kcal versus 41 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Duo de choux assaisonnés has less sugar: 1.2 g versus 2.5 g per 100 g.