Comparison

Duo d'asperges aux eclats de morilles vs Varma Koppen Sparris

Overall, Varma Koppen Sparris has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 ml

NutrientDuo d'asperges aux eclats de...Varma Koppen Sparris
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 53 kcal 53 kcal
Fat 3.6 g 1.8 g
Saturated fat 1.6 g 1 g
Sugars 0.6 g 8.5 g
Salt 0.8 g 1 g
Fiber 0.5 g 0.3 g
Protein 0.7 g 0.5 g
Additives25
AllergensGluten, MilkMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Varma Koppen Sparris has 51% less fat (1.8 g vs 3.6 g).
  • Varma Koppen Sparris has 41% less saturated fat (1 g vs 1.6 g).
  • Duo d'asperges aux eclats de morilles has 93% less sugar (0.6 g vs 8.5 g).
  • Only Duo d'asperges aux eclats de morilles lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Duo d'asperges aux eclats de morilles

Eau, légumes 22% (asperges blanches et vertes 13%, pomme de terre, oignon, épinard), _crème_, amidon transformé de maïs, morilles (réhydratées) 0,9%, huiles de tournesol oléique et de colza, sel, exhausteur de goût : glutamate de sodium, _lactose_ et _protéines de lait_, arôme (contient: _orge_).

Varma Koppen Sparris

majsstärkelse, glukossirap, maltodextrin, palmfett, salt, sparris 4.6%, potatisstärkelse, jästextrakt, _mjölkprotein_, emulgeringsmedel (E451), arom (innehåller _mjölk_), lök, solrosolja, färgämne (betakaroten), riboflavin.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Duo d'asperges aux eclats de morilles or Varma Koppen Sparris?

Overall, Varma Koppen Sparris has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Duo d'asperges aux eclats de morilles has fewer calories: 53 kcal versus 53 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Duo d'asperges aux eclats de morilles has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 8.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons