Dos de cabillaud vs Tempura Battered Lemon & Herb Basa Fillets
Overall, Dos de cabillaud has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Dos de cabillaud
Tempura Battered Lemon & Herb Basa Fillets
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Dos de cabillaud | Tempura Battered Lemon & Her... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 77 kcal | 163 kcal |
| Fat | 0.6 g | 6.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.9 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.4 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Protein | 18 g | 16.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 3 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish, Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Dos de cabillaud has 53% fewer calories (77 kcal vs 163 kcal).
- Dos de cabillaud has 91% less fat (0.6 g vs 6.6 g).
- Dos de cabillaud has 89% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.9 g).
- Dos de cabillaud has no sugar, while Tempura Battered Lemon & Herb Basa Fillets has 0.5 g.
- Tempura Battered Lemon & Herb Basa Fillets has 100% more fiber (0.3 g vs 0 g).
- Only Tempura Battered Lemon & Herb Basa Fillets lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Dos de cabillaud
Cabillaud MSC (POISSONS) qualité sans arête*, Gadus morhua sauvage pêché aux filets maillants et filets similaires, sennes, chaluts, lignes et hameçons, en Atlantique Nord-Est (FAO 27), sous-zones Mer de Barents (1), Mers de Norvège (II). * Malgré tout le soin apporté à la préparation de nos poissons qualité sans arête, la présence exceptionnelle d'arête n'est jamais exclue.
Tempura Battered Lemon & Herb Basa Fillets
Basa Fillet (73%) (Fish), Rapeseed Oil, Wheat Flour [Wheat Flour, Calcium Carbonate, Iron, Niacin (B3), Thiamin (BI)], Water, Gram Flour, Potato Starch, Maltodextrin, Salt, Wheat Gluten, Palm Oil, Lemon Powder, Raising Agents: Diphosphate, Sodium Bicarbonate; Flavouring, Parsley, Basil, Marjoram, Oregano, Thyme.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Dos de cabillaud or Tempura Battered Lemon & Herb Basa Fillets?
Overall, Dos de cabillaud has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Dos de cabillaud has fewer calories: 77 kcal versus 163 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Dos de cabillaud has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.