Comparison

Colin alaska pane msc 20x50g vs Dos de cabillaud

Overall, Dos de cabillaud has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientColin alaska pane msc 20x50gDos de cabillaud
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 3 —
Calories 175 kcal 77 kcal
Fat 7.6 g 0.6 g
Saturated fat 0.9 g 0.1 g
Sugars 1.1 g 0 g
Salt 0.7 g 0.2 g
Fiber 0.7 g 0 g
Protein 12.6 g 18 g
Additives00
AllergensFish, GlutenFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Dos de cabillaud has 56% fewer calories (77 kcal vs 175 kcal).
  • Dos de cabillaud has 92% less fat (0.6 g vs 7.6 g).
  • Dos de cabillaud has 89% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.9 g).
  • Dos de cabillaud has no sugar, while Colin alaska pane msc 20x50g has 1.1 g.
  • Dos de cabillaud has 73% less salt (0.2 g vs 0.7 g).
  • Colin alaska pane msc 20x50g has 100% more fiber (0.7 g vs 0 g).
  • Dos de cabillaud has 30% more protein (18 g vs 12.6 g).
  • Only Colin alaska pane msc 20x50g lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Colin alaska pane msc 20x50g

Filets de Colin d'Alaska (poissons) (Theragra chalcogramma) issus de pêche durable 70%, chapelure 14,1% (farine de blé, levure, sel, extrait de malt d'orge, paprika, curcuma), huile de colza, farine de blé, amidon de pomme de terre, eau, sel, poivre. Traces éventuelles de sésame. **Bien qu'un soin tout particulier ait été pris pour enlever les arêtes, quelques-unes peuvent exceptionnellement se retrouver dans ce produit.

Dos de cabillaud

Cabillaud MSC (POISSONS) qualité sans arête*, Gadus morhua sauvage pêché aux filets maillants et filets similaires, sennes, chaluts, lignes et hameçons, en Atlantique Nord-Est (FAO 27), sous-zones Mer de Barents (1), Mers de Norvège (II). * Malgré tout le soin apporté à la préparation de nos poissons qualité sans arête, la présence exceptionnelle d'arête n'est jamais exclue.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Colin alaska pane msc 20x50g or Dos de cabillaud?

Overall, Dos de cabillaud has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Dos de cabillaud has fewer calories: 77 kcal versus 175 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Dos de cabillaud has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons