Datteln entsteint / Dates pitted vs Dazzling Dates
Overall, Dazzling Dates has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Datteln entsteint / Dates pi... | Dazzling Dates |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | — |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 296 kcal | 267 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 65 g | 58 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 7.7 g |
| Protein | 1.9 g | 2.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Dazzling Dates has 11% less sugar (58 g vs 65 g).
- Dazzling Dates has 100% more fiber (7.7 g vs 0 g).
- Dazzling Dates has 18% more protein (2.3 g vs 1.9 g).
Ingredients
Datteln entsteint / Dates pitted
pitted and dried dates not sulphite, without addition of preservatives,
Dazzling Dates
dates (99%), sunflower oil
FAQ
Which is healthier: Datteln entsteint / Dates pitted or Dazzling Dates?
Overall, Dazzling Dates has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Dazzling Dates has fewer calories: 267 kcal versus 296 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Dazzling Dates has less sugar: 58 g versus 65 g per 100 g.