Comparison

Cured and cooked, formed beef pastrami slices vs Pastrami beef

Overall, Pastrami beef has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCured and cooked, formed bee...Pastrami beef
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group — 4
Calories 142 kcal 127 kcal
Fat 4.6 g 3.1 g
Saturated fat 1.8 g 1.1 g
Sugars 1.1 g 1 g
Salt 1.6 g 1.6 g
Fiber 0.5 g —
Protein 23.7 g 23 g
Additives04
AllergensBeefNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pastrami beef has 11% fewer calories (127 kcal vs 142 kcal).
  • Pastrami beef has 33% less fat (3.1 g vs 4.6 g).
  • Pastrami beef has 39% less saturated fat (1.1 g vs 1.8 g).
  • Only Cured and cooked, formed beef pastrami slices lists: Beef.

Ingredients

Cured and cooked, formed beef pastrami slices

BEEF Sainsbury's Taste the Difference Serving suggestion PASTRAMI BEEF SLICES New York deli style cured beef brisket, lightly seasoned with coriander, paprika and black pepper ENERGY FAT RACK SALT 17641 414004059049 && 46 % of the Relence istakes Typicals per 100g Energy SKATTE D IN POFE Keep refrigerated Use by Produced in the UK British beef

Pastrami beef

British Beef Brisket, Salt, Spices (Paprika, Coriander, Black Pepper), Sugar, Stabilisers: Diphosphates, Triphosphates; Potato Starch, Spice Extracts, Antioxidant: Sodium Ascorbate; Preservative: Sodium Nitrite. Made with 100g of beef per 100g of finished product.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Cured and cooked, formed beef pastrami slices or Pastrami beef?

Overall, Pastrami beef has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pastrami beef has fewer calories: 127 kcal versus 142 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pastrami beef has less sugar: 1 g versus 1.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons